You can help empower voters with the information they need when heading to the ballot box. Join the Ballotpedia Society.

Wisconsin Question 2, Only Designated Election Officials to Conduct Elections Amendment (April 2024)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Wisconsin Question 2
Flag of Wisconsin.png
Election date
April 2, 2024
Topic
Elections and campaigns
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Wisconsin Question 2, the Only Designated Election Officials to Conduct Elections Amendment, was on the ballot in Wisconsin as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on April 2, 2024. It was approved.[1][2]

A "yes" vote supported this amendment to provide that only election officials designated by law may administer elections.

A "no" vote opposed this amendment to provide that only election officials designated by law may administer elections.


Election results

Wisconsin Question 2

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

685,806 58.63%
No 483,900 41.37%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did Question 2 do?

See also: Text of measure

Question 2 added a new section to Article III of the state constitution that states that no one other than an election official authorized by law may help conduct any election in the state. The ballot question was placed on the ballot with another amendment to the same section that prohibited any level of government in the state from applying or accepting non-governmental funds or equipment for election administration. It was also approved.[2]

Who supported and opposed Question 2?

See also: Support and Opposition

Question 2 received endorsements from Election Integrity for Wisconsin, Opportunity Solutions Project, Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, and Wisconsin Voter Alliance. Madeline Malisa, visiting fellow at the Opportunity Solutions Project, said, "The funding of election operations, and where and how funds are being spent, are decisions that you—Wisconsin lawmakers—should make and not unaccountable special interest groups. Private funding of elections effectively allows private actors to influence who the winners and losers will be. These bills will safeguard Wisconsin elections from outside influence by prohibiting local governments from applying for, accepting, or spending any funding from private individuals or third parties for election administration. It will also allow only election officials to administer elections."[3]

Question 2 was opposed by All Voting is Local Action Wisconsin, Wisconsin Conservation Voters, and Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Sam Liebert, state director of All Voting is Local Action Wisconsin, said, "These proposals, under the guise of protecting our elections, are nothing more than thinly veiled attempts to restrict voting rights and undermine the very foundations of our democratic system. It is our duty to stand firm in defending the rights and inclusivity of all eligible voters in our democracy."[4]

How did Question 2 get on the ballot?

See also: Path to the ballot

In Wisconsin, the state legislature is required to approve an amendment by a simple majority vote in two successive sessions for the amendment to appear on the ballot. The joint resolution was approved during the 2021-2022 legislative session by a 21-11 vote in the Senate and a 58-32 vote in the Assembly. It was approved a second time during the 2023-2024 legislative session by a 21-10 vote in the Senate and 60-35 vote in the Assembly. The resolution placed two separate questions on the April ballot related to election administration. Question 1 prohibited any level of government in the state from applying or accepting non-governmental funds or equipment for election administration.

Text of measure

Ballot question

The ballot question for the amendment was as follows:[2]

Election officials. Shall section 7 (2) of Article III of the constitution be created to provide that only election officials designated by law may perform tasks in the conduct of primaries, elections, and referendums?[5]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article III, Wisconsin Constitution

The measure added section 7 of Article III of the state constitution. The following underlined text was added:[2]

Section 7 (2) No individual other than an election official designated by law may perform any task in the conduct of any primary, election, or referendum.[5]

Full text

The full text can be read here.

Support

Supporters

Officials

Organizations

  • Election Integrity for Wisconsin
  • Opportunity Solutions Project
  • Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty
  • Wisconsin Voter Alliance


Arguments

  • Kyle Koenen, the policy director of the Wisconsin Institute for Liberty & Law: "In the interest of upholding fairness and safeguarding the integrity of our democratic process, it is essential to maintain a non-partisan electoral system that is free from external financial influences. The concerns that have been expressed regarding Mark Zuckerberg's extensive funding of election administration in Democratic-leaning communities closely parallel the worries that would emerge if a donor with right-leaning inclinations were to direct their resources exclusively toward Republican-leaning areas. AJR 77 and SJR 78 underscore the need to establish a clear standard: private funding should not have a role in the administration of Wisconsin's elections."
  • Madeline Malisa, visiting fellow at the Opportunity Solutions Project: "The funding of election operations, and where and how funds are being spent, are decisions that you—Wisconsin lawmakers—should make and not unaccountable special interest groups. Private funding of elections effectively allows private actors to influence who the winners and losers will be. These bills will safeguard Wisconsin elections from outside influence by prohibiting local governments from applying for, accepting, or spending any funding from private individuals or third parties for election administration. It will also allow only election officials to administer elections."


Opposition

Opponents

Organizations

  • ACLU of Wisconsin
  • All Voting is Local Action Wisconsin
  • League of Women Voters of Wisconsin
  • Wisconsin Conservation Voters
  • Wisconsin Democracy Campaign


Arguments

  • Kyle Johnson, political director for Black Leaders Organizing Communities (BLOC): "Question two would reduce municipal clerks’ resources by limiting the involvement of community members and volunteers to help with elections. Elections are made up of many moving pieces. Clerks and election officials rely on volunteers, such as election observers and nonpartisan organizations, to inform the public about their right to vote."
  • ACLU of Wisconsin: "Our democracy depends on local election officials having the staff and resources to do their jobs. The same politicians who put these questions on the ballot stripped millions in funding from the state budget to support election administration. Vote to preserve our constitution. Vote to protect our right to vote. Vote No."
  • Sam Liebert, state director of All Voting is Local Action Wisconsin: "These proposals, under the guise of protecting our elections, are nothing more than thinly veiled attempts to restrict voting rights and undermine the very foundations of our democratic system. It is our duty to stand firm in defending the rights and inclusivity of all eligible voters in our democracy."
  • Joan Schwarz, secretary of the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin: "Now is the time to be mindful that our Constitution not become the repository for a flurry of controversial, restrictive social policies with misleading and ambiguous language that the gerrymandered Legislature is proposing which, if passed, will be enshrined in our Constitution."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Wisconsin ballot measures

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this amendment, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Background

Wisconsin law governing election officials

Chapter 7 of Wisconsin Statutes governs election officials also known as poll workers. Election officials serve as chief election inspectors, election inspectors, greeters, tabulators, election registration officials, and special voting deputies. State law requires a municipality's governing board to appoint election inspectors from lists of nominees presented by the two dominant political parties. If municipalities do not receive party-nominating lists, the mayor, president, or chairperson may nominate eligible individuals regardless of party affiliation.[6]

State law requires all election officials to be qualified voters in the county in which the polling place where they will serve is. Election officials cannot be candidates on the ballot, and election inspectors cannot be immediately related to any candidate on the ballot.[6]

Article III, Wisconsin Constitution

See also: Article III, Wisconsin Constitution

Article III of the Wisconsin Constitution is entitled Suffrage and consists of six sections, three of which were repealed in April 1986 with the approval of Question 1.

Wisconsin constitutional amendments

Between 1995 and 2023, Wisconsin voters decided on 17 constitutional amendments—approving 13 (76.47%) and defeating 4 (23.53%).

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Wisconsin Constitution

In Wisconsin, the state legislature is required to approve an amendment by majority vote in two successive sessions for the amendment to appear on the ballot.

2021-2022 legislative session

The amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 101 (SJR 101). The Wisconsin State Senate approved the amendment by a vote of 21-11 with one not voting on February 22, 2022. The Wisconsin State Assembly approved SJR 101 by a vote of 58-32 with five not voting on February 24, 2022.[1]

Vote in the Wisconsin State Senate
February 22, 2022
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 17  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total21111
Total percent63.7%33.3%3.0%
Democrat0111
Republican2100

Vote in the Wisconsin House of Representatives
February 24, 2022
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 48  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total58325
Total percent61.0%33.7%5.3%
Democrat0324
Republican5801

2023-2024 legislative session

The amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 78 (SJR 78). The Wisconsin State Senate approved the amendment by a vote of 21-10 with two not voting on November 7, 2023. The Wisconsin State Assembly approved SJR 78 by a vote of 60-35 with four not voting on November 9, 2023. The resolution placed two separate questions on the April ballot related to election administration.[1]

Vote in the Wisconsin State Senate
November 7, 2023
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 17  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total21102
Total percent63.6%30.3%6.1%
Democrat0101
Republican2101

Vote in the Wisconsin House of Representatives
November 9, 2023
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 50  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total60354
Total percent60.6%35.4%4.0%
Democrat0350
Republican6004

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Wisconsin

Click "Show" to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Wisconsin.

See also

External links

Footnotes